Book a meeting
Insights

Brexit creates withholding tax leakage for UK pension funds, UCITS and AIFs

Brexit impacts UK pension funds and investment funds with withholding tax challenges in the EU, as exemptions become limited. Learn how to navigate this complex tax landscape.

In Europe, a large number of countries offer exemption from withholding tax on dividend payments to their own pension funds, in purely domestic situations.

In recent years, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled, more than once, that limiting eligibility for withholding tax exemption to domestic situations only, infringes on the freedom of capital (one of the fundamental freedoms within the EU), as it discourages foreign pension funds from investing in that country. As the free movement of capital applies not only to intra EU situations, but also to capital movements from EU countries to “third countries", withholding tax exemptions that apply in EU member states in domestic situations can now generally be claimed by pension funds in other  countries (both EU and non-EU) as well.

Most EU countries have by now adapted their the tax laws, such that an exemption extends to EU/EEA resident pension funds. And as a result, often clear procedures are in place that describe how EU pension funds can obtain exemption from withholding tax. However, in spite of the fact that, according to the ECJ, third countries should also be eligible for exemption, many EU member states still have not extended their exemptions to third countries.

As a result of Brexit, the UK has become a third country. Consequently, in many EU countries, UK pension funds have lost access to withholding tax exemptions. Without a clear legal exemption and procedures, paying- and withholding agents are  likely to no longer offer services for relief at source, nor for reclaims in arrears. For example, recently Clearstream Bank informed its UK clients that it will stop with certain tax relief procedures.

UK pension funds now will have to obtain their withholding tax benefits themselves by directly engaging with local tax offices and objecting to the tax withheld, invoking the free movement of capital and the underpinning ECJ case law. Or by invoking the bilateral tax treaties that the UK has concluded with EU member states. But those treaties often do not provide for a full exemption or refund of dividend withholding tax for pension funds.

Similarly, as a result of Brexit, UK UCITS and AIFs are facing a higher withholding tax as - strictly speaking - they are no longer eligible for relief from withholding tax in countries that provide relief to funds if they are regulated under the two EU directives (for UCITS and AIFs). Although many of such UK funds will still be comparable to UCITS and AIFs, they too are likely to become dependent on claiming withholding tax in arrears and invoking the free movement of capital and ECJ case law.

UK pension funds and UCITS/AIF's that would like to get a better understanding of this issue and what it means for their withholding tax position are welcome to leave us a message at info@taxology-global.com.

Jeroen van der Wal

Founder and CEO

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 • 16 minute read

iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25): the CJEU draws the line between real and theoretical tax neutralization

The Court of Justice of the European Union has delivered its judgment in iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25), concerning the Spanish taxation of dividends received by a US investment fund. The case adds a new question to the CJEU's extensive case law on discriminatory withholding taxation of non-resident investment funds: can a restriction on the free movement of capital be neutralized on the ground that a foreign fund could have chosen a tax treatment in its state of residence under which it would have been able to credit the source-state tax, even though it did not make that choice?

Tax news

AUGUST 18, 2026 • 10 minute read

What MiKaDiv Means for Non-Resident Investors

Discover how MiKaDiv changes German withholding tax reclaims, and what impact it has for non-resident investors.

Tax news

JUNE 12, 2026 • 6 minute read

What Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 Actually Says About FASTER's Reach

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 has resolved the critical open question in the FASTER Directive: which EU member states must operate under the new fast-track withholding tax framework, and which can stay outside it. The answer will define the operational landscape for institutional investors and custodians from 1 January 2030 onwards.

Tax news