Book a meeting
Insights

Dutch government wants additional dividend stripping measures

The Dutch government seeks new strategies to combat dividend stripping and prevent tax avoidance, aiming for implementation by 2024.

Dutch government wants additional Dutch dividend stripping measures

The Dutch government wants to take additional dividend stripping measures to better tackle dividend stripping. It is undesirable that no or less dividend tax is paid due to this form of tax avoidance. However, given the current laws and regulations, this is not always possible. Additional measures will be investigated and further elaborated in the near future.

With dividend stripping, the economic and legal rights to dividends are split in order to obtain a tax advantage. For this purpose, the legal ownership of the shares is, for example, (temporarily) lent to another party (also known as securities lending) that has a more favorable tax situation, such as a Dutch shareholder who can offset the dividend tax. This limits or prevents the levying of dividend tax.

Dutch State Secretary Marnix van Rij: “The cabinet considers it undesirable that parties pay no or less tax by means of dividend stripping. The complexity and international character of dividend stripping show that the current measures are insufficient. New, additional measures are therefore necessary.”

The government has recently investigated how the approach to dividend stripping can best be improved. An internet consultation was also held to map out the impact of possible alternative measures. In the coming period, the government will investigate and further develop the following additional measures to combat dividend stripping more effectively:

  • Restrict set-off or refund of dividend tax (net yield/tax base approach);

  • Stricter documentation obligations;

  • Legislation of the reference date on which it is determined who is entitled to receive the dividend;

Introduction of a legal provision to determine whether a person (together with related parties) holds the beneficial interest in the shares.

Further research is being carried out into whether it is possible to convert these alternatives into well-functioning and easily implementable measures. The government is also looking at how the information and evidence position of the Tax and Customs Administration can be improved. In addition, further research is being carried out into whether an additional measure should be introduced that focuses on pension funds.

International developments in the field of legislation and regulations are also monitored, because dividend stripping often takes place across national borders. Because dividend stripping continues to develop, it is also important to be able to make timely adjustments where necessary. That is why the government will monitor the new measures to be introduced.

Further research will be carried out in the near future and it will be examined whether and how these measures can be elaborated in a bill. The additional measures are not expected to become effective before 1 January, 2024.

Jeroen van der Wal

Founder and CEO

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 • 16 minute read

iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25): the CJEU draws the line between real and theoretical tax neutralization

The Court of Justice of the European Union has delivered its judgment in iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25), concerning the Spanish taxation of dividends received by a US investment fund. The case adds a new question to the CJEU's extensive case law on discriminatory withholding taxation of non-resident investment funds: can a restriction on the free movement of capital be neutralized on the ground that a foreign fund could have chosen a tax treatment in its state of residence under which it would have been able to credit the source-state tax, even though it did not make that choice?

Tax news

AUGUST 18, 2026 • 10 minute read

What MiKaDiv Means for Non-Resident Investors

Discover how MiKaDiv changes German withholding tax reclaims, and what impact it has for non-resident investors.

Tax news

JUNE 12, 2026 • 6 minute read

What Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 Actually Says About FASTER's Reach

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 has resolved the critical open question in the FASTER Directive: which EU member states must operate under the new fast-track withholding tax framework, and which can stay outside it. The answer will define the operational landscape for institutional investors and custodians from 1 January 2030 onwards.

Tax news