Book a meeting
Insights

Dutch Supreme Court opens the door to ECJ reclaims in the Netherlands by foreign investment funds

Foreign investment funds can now reclaim Dutch dividend withholding tax, aligning with EU free movement of capital principles.

Dutch Supreme Court opens the door to refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax to foreign investment funds based on the EU free movement of capital, also known as ECJ reclaims.

Today, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that foreign investment funds that meet certain shareholder conditions are eligible for refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax. These are the same conditions that Dutch investments must also meet for a refund of dividend withholding tax. In doing so, the Supreme Court repeals an earlier decision from 2015. In that decision it had decided that foreign investment funds are never objectively comparable to Dutch investment funds because they are not liable to withhold Dutch dividend withholding tax, while Dutch investment funds are. And because their situations are not comparable there would no discrimination prohibited by the free movement of capital. And consequently no entitlement to refund. Today's Supreme Court decision is in line with the ECJ's  decision in the 2018 Fidelity Funds case. This is a case concerning a very comparable Danish situation (click here to read our analysis of the Fidelity Funds decision). The refund to foreign investment funds is reduced by the amount of Dutch dividend withholding tax that would have been owed when both the foreign investment fund and its participants had been tax resident in the Netherlands. In other words, a refund is granted only with respect to those participants who, in a fully Dutch internal situation, would not have owed any Dutch dividend withholding tax either. Contact us if you would like to know more about this decision.

Jeroen van der Wal

Founder and CEO

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 • 16 minute read

iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25): the CJEU draws the line between real and theoretical tax neutralization

The Court of Justice of the European Union has delivered its judgment in iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25), concerning the Spanish taxation of dividends received by a US investment fund. The case adds a new question to the CJEU's extensive case law on discriminatory withholding taxation of non-resident investment funds: can a restriction on the free movement of capital be neutralized on the ground that a foreign fund could have chosen a tax treatment in its state of residence under which it would have been able to credit the source-state tax, even though it did not make that choice?

Tax news

AUGUST 18, 2026 • 10 minute read

What MiKaDiv Means for Non-Resident Investors

Discover how MiKaDiv changes German withholding tax reclaims, and what impact it has for non-resident investors.

Tax news

JUNE 12, 2026 • 6 minute read

What Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 Actually Says About FASTER's Reach

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 has resolved the critical open question in the FASTER Directive: which EU member states must operate under the new fast-track withholding tax framework, and which can stay outside it. The answer will define the operational landscape for institutional investors and custodians from 1 January 2030 onwards.

Tax news