Book a meeting
Insights

EC asks Belgium to stop taxing foreign insurance companies more heavily than Belgian insurance companies

The European Commission urges Belgium to align its tax policies for foreign insurance firms with EU law, challenging potential discrimination.

Last Friday, the European Commission (“EC”) has requested Belgium to stop taxing foreign life insurance companies more heavily on Belgian source dividends, interest and income from real estate. Belgian insurance companies are often effectively exempt or almost fully exempt (as a result of deductions and provisions that are tax deductible and no withholding tax being due or being fully refundable) while foreign insurance companies are subject to a final withholding tax ranging from 15 to 30%. This less favorable tax treatment of foreign insurance companies is possibly a discrimination that is prohibited by EU law, more specifically the free movement of capital as laid down in article 63 of the EU Treaty. Belgium has two months to respond. If it does not respond, the EC will likely send a “reasoned opinion”, which is a more elaborate and more formal request. Belgium then has another two months to respond. If it does not, or not satisfactory, the EC is likely to refer the case to the European Court of Justice. In practice, most cases are settled before they go to the ECJ.

The potential ramifications of this request are much wider than just Belgium. There are more EU member states which tax foreign life insurance companies more heavily than domestic life insurance companies. They face similar action from the EC. If you would like to informally discuss what withholding tax reclaim opportunities this development may bring to your company, please contact us.

Jeroen van der Wal

Founder and CEO

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 • 16 minute read

iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25): the CJEU draws the line between real and theoretical tax neutralization

The Court of Justice of the European Union has delivered its judgment in iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25), concerning the Spanish taxation of dividends received by a US investment fund. The case adds a new question to the CJEU's extensive case law on discriminatory withholding taxation of non-resident investment funds: can a restriction on the free movement of capital be neutralized on the ground that a foreign fund could have chosen a tax treatment in its state of residence under which it would have been able to credit the source-state tax, even though it did not make that choice?

Tax news

AUGUST 18, 2026 • 10 minute read

What MiKaDiv Means for Non-Resident Investors

Discover how MiKaDiv changes German withholding tax reclaims, and what impact it has for non-resident investors.

Tax news

JUNE 12, 2026 • 6 minute read

What Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 Actually Says About FASTER's Reach

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 has resolved the critical open question in the FASTER Directive: which EU member states must operate under the new fast-track withholding tax framework, and which can stay outside it. The answer will define the operational landscape for institutional investors and custodians from 1 January 2030 onwards.

Tax news