Book a meeting
Insights

European Commission urges Sweden to amend its rules on taxation of dividends to foreign public pension institutions

The European Commission challenges Sweden's dividend tax rules for foreign pension funds, citing a breach of the free movement of capital. Sweden has two months to respond.

After the European Commission had formally requested Sweden to stop applying a higher dividend withholding tax to foreign pension institutions and insurance companies respectively in its February 2021 infringement package, the Commission has now decided to send a reasoned opinion (the next step in infringement proceedings) to Sweden regarding its taxation of dividends paid to public pension institutions. Whereas Swedish public pension funds are, as state agencies, entirely exempt from tax liability, including Swedish dividend withholding tax, dividends paid to comparable foreign public pension funds are subject to a withholding tax, commonly at a rate of 15% over gross dividend income. The 15% rate is the reduced rate that results from the double tax treaties concluded between Sweden and other EU/EEA countries. 

The European Commission takes the position that such a fiscal scheme under which dividends paid to foreign public pension funds are subject to less favourable treatment than similar distributions in purely domestic situations infringes the free movement of capital (Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement). Sweden has two months to respond after which the Commission may decide to refer the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The European Court of Justice has already ruled in several cases that EU member states that levy a higher withholding tax from foreign pension funds, or that exempt their domestic pension funds while subjecting foreign pension funds to tax are violating the free movement of capital. Well known examples of such cases are the 2012 Commission vs Republic of Finland case (Case C-342/10), and the 2019 College Pension Plan case (Case 641/17)

Jeroen van der Wal

Founder and CEO

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 • 16 minute read

iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25): the CJEU draws the line between real and theoretical tax neutralization

The Court of Justice of the European Union has delivered its judgment in iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25), concerning the Spanish taxation of dividends received by a US investment fund. The case adds a new question to the CJEU's extensive case law on discriminatory withholding taxation of non-resident investment funds: can a restriction on the free movement of capital be neutralized on the ground that a foreign fund could have chosen a tax treatment in its state of residence under which it would have been able to credit the source-state tax, even though it did not make that choice?

Tax news

AUGUST 18, 2026 • 10 minute read

What MiKaDiv Means for Non-Resident Investors

Discover how MiKaDiv changes German withholding tax reclaims, and what impact it has for non-resident investors.

Tax news

JUNE 12, 2026 • 6 minute read

What Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 Actually Says About FASTER's Reach

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 has resolved the critical open question in the FASTER Directive: which EU member states must operate under the new fast-track withholding tax framework, and which can stay outside it. The answer will define the operational landscape for institutional investors and custodians from 1 January 2030 onwards.

Tax news