Book a meeting
Insights

European Commission requests GERMANY to bring its withholding tax in line with EU law

The European Commission urges Germany to amend its withholding tax laws to ensure equal treatment for foreign charities under EU regulations.

European Commission requests Germany to align its withholding tax on foreign charities in with EU law.

The European Commission announced in its april 2022 infringement package that it decided to send a letter of formal notice to Germany requesting it to amend its legislation regarding withholding tax on dividends and interest paid to foreign charities.

Under German tax law, dividends and interest paid to charities having their legal seat or the place of management in Germany are either exempt from withholding tax, or withholding tax is fully refunded. However, dividends and interest paid to comparable charities established in other EU and EEA Member States and third countries are taxed at a gross rate of 25% unless a relevant Double Tax Agreement provides for a reduced witholding tax rate on dividends and interest.

This difference in tax treatment of foreign charities compared to German charities seems to constitute a restriction on the free movement of capital, as meant in Article 63 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (also known as the EU treaty) and Article 40 European Economic Area Agreement. The European Economic Area includes all EU member states and Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Such restrictions are prohibited under article 63 TFEU and article 40 of the EEA Agreement as they make investment in Germany less attractive for foreign charities. And while EU member states are not forced under EU law to recognize foreign institutions' charitable status under foreign law, a foreign charity that satisfies the requirements for charitable status and promotes the same public interests as domestic charities must be granted equally beneficial tax treatment as domestic charities This follows from established case law of the European Court of Justice, such as the Persche case (C-318/078) and the Walter Stauffer case (C-386/04).

If Germany does not provide a satisfactory response within the next two months, the Commission may decide to send a reasoned opinion.

Jeroen van der Wal

Founder and CEO

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 • 16 minute read

iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25): the CJEU draws the line between real and theoretical tax neutralization

The Court of Justice of the European Union has delivered its judgment in iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25), concerning the Spanish taxation of dividends received by a US investment fund. The case adds a new question to the CJEU's extensive case law on discriminatory withholding taxation of non-resident investment funds: can a restriction on the free movement of capital be neutralized on the ground that a foreign fund could have chosen a tax treatment in its state of residence under which it would have been able to credit the source-state tax, even though it did not make that choice?

Tax news

AUGUST 18, 2026 • 10 minute read

What MiKaDiv Means for Non-Resident Investors

Discover how MiKaDiv changes German withholding tax reclaims, and what impact it has for non-resident investors.

Tax news

JUNE 12, 2026 • 6 minute read

What Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 Actually Says About FASTER's Reach

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/110 has resolved the critical open question in the FASTER Directive: which EU member states must operate under the new fast-track withholding tax framework, and which can stay outside it. The answer will define the operational landscape for institutional investors and custodians from 1 January 2030 onwards.

Tax news